Moral Reasoning and Contemporary Issues †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Moral Reasoning and Contemporary Issues. Answer: Introduction: The essay concentrates on the moral conflict that occurred in the history and the contemporary society. It has been argued that not any kind of view or belief should be viewed as morally acceptable. This brings the different perspectives that include the religious perspectives, the political perspectives and the moral perspectives. By analyzing the attack of the world Trade Centre an ethical dilemma rises. The people doing this with the objective of establishing the religious belief is right to some extent and the other school of belief, opines the fact that they are wrong. The debate can give rise to different angles. This gives to the idea of righteous war whereas the other angle that can be analyzed is whether it is ethical and justified that the innocent are being killed. The argument grows with the fact whether the source of the belief of the act of misdeeds should be respected or not. Usually every individual becomes intolerant of the unjustified behavior. It is however a matte r of fact that no one understands the reason of intolerance of others. With the study of the effects of the attack of 9/11 this can be mentioned that some important ethical questions comes up to the mind of the individuals and that should be analyzed. There is a parity between the theory of ethical relativism, ethical absolutism and ethical pluralism (Pearson, 2016). In understanding the ethics behind the attack of 9/11 all the three theories of ethics should be analyzed. The ethical relativism reveals that every individuals belong to one specific culture and that specific culture have certain specific belief. The individual is born and brought up in that particular belief so according to him that particular belief is correct. He judge the culture of other religion or any other cultural group from the other point of view. He views the culture of other from the point of view of an outsider (Peters, 2015). The other point is the ethical absolutism. According to this belief, there is no one and there is one single moral truth. It includes that those who support absolutism usually believe that they know what this absolute truth is. The individuals belief in one single truth and that is the belief which he is used to. It includes the truth that the individual is used to belief from his childhood (Vaughn, 2015). He is not concerned about the fact wheth er his belief is right or wrong, whether it might harm other individuals or not. The other concept is the ethical pluralism. It includes the multiple perspectives on any issue. Each issue contains part of the truth but none of them is the whole truth. None of the theories in this have the entire truth or the entire answer. They have multiple truth that captures truth of the moral life. The argument cannot be summed up with a single conclusion. Both the perspectives are correct from their own point of views. The victim and the person responsible for the crime are both correct from their own angles (Rooney, 2016). Reference Pearson, R. (2016). Beyond ethical relativism in public relations: Coorientation, rules, and the idea of communication symmetry. In Public relations research annual (pp. 77-96). Routledge. Peters, R. S. (2015). Psychology and Ethical Development (Routledge Revivals): A Collection of Articles on Psychological Theories, Ethical Development and Human Understanding. Routledge. Rooney, E. (2016). Seductive reasoning: Pluralism as the problematic of contemporary literary theory. Cornell University Press. Vaughn, L. (2015). Doing ethics: Moral reasoning and contemporary issues. WW Norton Company.