Sunday, May 17, 2020

Summary Of Mending Wall By Robert Frost - 723 Words

â€Å"Mending Wall† Robert Lee Frost is a very distinguished author born in March 26, 1874, his work was first published in England before it was introduced into America. He is known for the realism found in his works and his depiction of America he would also talk about certain aspects of England in the twentieth century and used his experience to look at interesting themes of social and cultural nature. By 1915, he had published two full-length collections, A Boy’s Will (1913) and North of Boston (1914), by this time he was very well established as a known author. By the early nineteen hundred he was celebrated poet in America. His fame and honors increased Robert Frost was an awarded author being recognized during his life several times,†¦show more content†¦When hearing the repeated words (Good fences make good neighbors), the reader begins to think about the different obstacles or divisions in our life’s like fences or gates, borders, legal line etc . The wall symbolizes this idea of how people, and their relationships with others work and are discussed. Line 13: The wall is ironic because, it separates the neighbors but also brings them together. Line 14: The wall is an extended metaphor for the division that separate the neighbors. Line 16: To each creates a parallel, as which emphasizes the separation between the neighbor’s Line 21: Another kind of out-door game becomes a metaphor for the fixing of the wall making it seem fun to the speaker. Line: 27: The proverb Good fences make good neighbors is something can be heard all the time. Line 27:Good fences make good neighbors is a paradox when you contrast it with the first words of the poem, Something there is that doesn’t love a wall† Line 35: Offence is a pun it sounds like a fence. Nature in the poem can be a hidden subject that influences and moves around the main characters in the poems. Nature is not clearly pointed out in the poem and no land scape is described to detail but it’s still clear how the scenery is during that time. like nature tradition is another silent subject that is talked about in the story and brings out this debate about why follow a tradition when there is no use for it. The neighborShow MoreRelatedRobert Frost : A New England Poet3698 Words   |  15 PagesRobert Lee Frost Known for being a New England poet Robert Frost was born in San Francisco, California on March 26th, 1874. Born to a New England father William Prescott Frost Jr. and a Scottish mother Isabelle Moodie who moved to the west coast from Pennsylvania after marriage (Bailey). Both his parents were teachers and poets themselves, but his father later became a journalist with the San Francisco Evening Bulletin (Bailey). Frost spent 12 years of his life growing up in San Francisco, untilRead MoreBusiness and Management2600 Words   |  11 Pages | | | | | | | | | |Mending Wall, Robert Frost (pp. 197-199) | | | | |The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock, T. S. Eliot (pp.199-203) |

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Cultural Intelligence And Its Impact On Culture - 1561 Words

Today corporations have turned global. So it is very important that employees and top management both understand the cultural intelligence so they can execute the effective leadership and management tactics. Cultural intelligence provides an opportunity to understand and effectively function across the different cultures (Dyne, Ang Livermore, 2009). For any leader to work efficiently and effectively in different culture environment it is very important to have cultural knowledge and adaptability. To work in different culture it is necessary to have knowledge of norms, habits , and behaviors in the underlying culture so leaders can use it in favor of business. A leader should also understand the difference between his home country†¦show more content†¦Any employee or leader working in foreign cultural environment should understand how the culture influence the business and the problem solving techniques of that culture to avoid the failure. Background of Roaring Dragon Hotel Case Roaring Dragon Hotel was a three star state owned enterprise (SOE) in south-west China. The hotel staffing included the employees who transferred from other SOEs who considered working in Roaring Dragon Hotel prestigious and had some guanxi or connections. The overall organizational culture was relaxed (Grainger, 2003). The actual management practices of Roaring Dragon Hotel was conventional, with least concern for the development or expansion of the hotel s business. The provincial government was concerned with the under utilization of the hotel resources so started looking for modernization. The Hotel International (HI) was selected for revamping of the Roaring Dragon Hotel (Grainger, 2003). Paul Fortune from England was appointed as the general manager for this transition process of the Roaring Dragon Hotel. As his revamping efforts it was decided to demolish the old section of the hotel and replace it with five star wing. A massive employee training program was conducted to meet the world class standards. This training program was followed by employee retrenchment program. After the modernization

Tuesday, May 5, 2020

Moral Reasoning and Contemporary Issues †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Moral Reasoning and Contemporary Issues. Answer: Introduction: The essay concentrates on the moral conflict that occurred in the history and the contemporary society. It has been argued that not any kind of view or belief should be viewed as morally acceptable. This brings the different perspectives that include the religious perspectives, the political perspectives and the moral perspectives. By analyzing the attack of the world Trade Centre an ethical dilemma rises. The people doing this with the objective of establishing the religious belief is right to some extent and the other school of belief, opines the fact that they are wrong. The debate can give rise to different angles. This gives to the idea of righteous war whereas the other angle that can be analyzed is whether it is ethical and justified that the innocent are being killed. The argument grows with the fact whether the source of the belief of the act of misdeeds should be respected or not. Usually every individual becomes intolerant of the unjustified behavior. It is however a matte r of fact that no one understands the reason of intolerance of others. With the study of the effects of the attack of 9/11 this can be mentioned that some important ethical questions comes up to the mind of the individuals and that should be analyzed. There is a parity between the theory of ethical relativism, ethical absolutism and ethical pluralism (Pearson, 2016). In understanding the ethics behind the attack of 9/11 all the three theories of ethics should be analyzed. The ethical relativism reveals that every individuals belong to one specific culture and that specific culture have certain specific belief. The individual is born and brought up in that particular belief so according to him that particular belief is correct. He judge the culture of other religion or any other cultural group from the other point of view. He views the culture of other from the point of view of an outsider (Peters, 2015). The other point is the ethical absolutism. According to this belief, there is no one and there is one single moral truth. It includes that those who support absolutism usually believe that they know what this absolute truth is. The individuals belief in one single truth and that is the belief which he is used to. It includes the truth that the individual is used to belief from his childhood (Vaughn, 2015). He is not concerned about the fact wheth er his belief is right or wrong, whether it might harm other individuals or not. The other concept is the ethical pluralism. It includes the multiple perspectives on any issue. Each issue contains part of the truth but none of them is the whole truth. None of the theories in this have the entire truth or the entire answer. They have multiple truth that captures truth of the moral life. The argument cannot be summed up with a single conclusion. Both the perspectives are correct from their own point of views. The victim and the person responsible for the crime are both correct from their own angles (Rooney, 2016). Reference Pearson, R. (2016). Beyond ethical relativism in public relations: Coorientation, rules, and the idea of communication symmetry. In Public relations research annual (pp. 77-96). Routledge. Peters, R. S. (2015). Psychology and Ethical Development (Routledge Revivals): A Collection of Articles on Psychological Theories, Ethical Development and Human Understanding. Routledge. Rooney, E. (2016). Seductive reasoning: Pluralism as the problematic of contemporary literary theory. Cornell University Press. Vaughn, L. (2015). Doing ethics: Moral reasoning and contemporary issues. WW Norton Company.